Call for Application Round 2

 Call for Application Round 2

SECTION A: BACKGROUND

A1. Funding opportunity description

Makerere University received special funding from the Government of the Republic of Uganda, to support high impact Research and Innovations. The Financial Year 2020/21 will be the second year of this fund’s availability. The fund illustrates the increasing importance that the Government attaches to Research and Innovation as a driver of socio-economic transformation. The objective of the fund is to increase the local generation of translatable research and scalable innovations that address key gaps required to drive Uganda’s development agenda. The fund is therefore aimed at complementing available funding to address key research needs of the government sectors by addressing unfunded priorities critical to accelerating development. In the last Financial Year (2019/2020), 224 projects were funded under Round 1 of this Fund. In the next Financial Year (2020/21), Makerere University expects another 30 Billion Uganda shillings (about US$ 8,100,000) under the Government Research and Innovation Fund (RIF). Of this, 12.5 Billion Shillings will fund new ideas that respond to a widely consultative Research Agenda focused on national priorities. The Makerere University Research and Innovation Grants Management Committee (GMC) therefore announces the RIF Round 2, Track 1 (Research & Innovation Agenda-Based Grants). Available funds are obligated for the Financial Year 2020/2021, with an expectation of actionable results that speak to the National Research and Innovation Agenda. The GMC therefore invites applications with original ideas that demonstrate a clear link to key thematic areas of the National Research and Innovation Agenda.

A2. Research for Economic Development

To transition to middle-income status, low-income countries must increasingly invest in research and innovations that provide solutions to persistent development challenges. Universities should be at the fore-front of driving this research agenda. The Government of Uganda drafted the 2nd National Development Plan (NDP) (2015-2020), specifying key areas of development investments needed to take the country to the next level. Resulting from this plan, different sectors have developed their Sectoral Development Plans (e.g. the Health Sector Development Plan 2015-2020 and the Agriculture Sector Development Plan (2015-2020). The NDP has been revised and the 3rd Plan is currently in draft. However, the NDP and sector-specific plans require research to fill evidence gaps. The main objective of the RIF is to support R&I initiatives that contribute to better delivery of National Development initiatives in all sectors critical to the economy.

A3. Scope and Technical Description of the Research and Innovation Grant

The RIF GMC’s terms of reference include the development of an instructive research agenda as the basis for identifying funding priorities. In preparation for the RIF Round 2, the GMC conducted a comprehensive stakeholder consultation to identify thematic areas of focus for the grant. These consultations included meetings with representatives from key government sectors, semi-autonomous government agencies, the private-for-profit sector and civil society. The GMC triangulated this information with that from the draft National Development Plan III, Makerere University Strategic Plan and Research Agenda and the thematic outputs from the RIF Round 1 proposals.  RIF Round 2, Track 1 (Research & Innovation Agenda-Based Grants) will therefore specifically target research and innovation ideas that align with priority thematic issues in the instructive Research Agenda that arose from these consultations. Research and Innovation ideas are therefore sought in the following thematic areas:

The Government R&I Grant will cover all technical disciplines in Makerere University as long as the research questions align with the instructive research agenda themes above. Particular attention will be paid to unfunded priorities, those for which funding has been inadequate, or for which available funding only covers one or a few of the components needed to inform development initiatives in a holistic way. This grant is not primarily meant to supplement existing research projects that already have funding from other sources. However, researchers can apply on the platform of existing projects if they provide a strong justification that there are important funding gaps in the current research project, why addressing these gaps is crucial and the added deliverables expected from the additional support to the existing research effort. This grant also emphasizes a multi-sectoral approach. Research groups are therefore encouraged to work with other sectors that complement their technical focus.

A4. Categories and size of grants to be issued:

Grants will be issued in the following categories:

Note:

The R&I Grants Management Committee reserves the right to determine/change the number and size of awards based on prevailing circumstances informed by demand, quality of applications, availability of funds and level of utilization of funds by grantees. 50% of all awards will go to research or ecosystem strengthening projects while 50% will go innovation-based projects. ** Half of the grants in Category 3 will be given to Junior Faculty. Junior Researchers can apply as PIs in any of the categories listed above, but they will have a dedicated earmark of 12 projects in this category. Junior Faculty is not defined by age, but by rank and research experience. They are defined as researchers at the rank of Lecturer and below or researchers with less than 5 years of experience in research/innovation or less than 2 years as independent researchers/innovators, or have never been PIs for a research/innovation project greater than US$ 100,000 (or 365 Million Uganda Shillings).

B1. Guidelines for Eligibility

This grant targets researchers and innovators from Makerere University. This includes Makerere University appointed academic staff (Assistant Lecturers, Lecturers, Senior Lecturers, Associate Professors and Professors) and research staff who hold a valid and current appointment (research fellows and senior research fellows). Academic staff from all Colleges of Makerere University are eligible to apply as well as senior staff from the following administrative units (Library, Gender Mainstreaming, Guidance and Counselling, Quality Assurance, Planning, and the Directorate of Research and Graduate Training). Individual researchers or research teams will be required to have a letter of support from the Head of the academic unit under which the lead researcher is tenured. Researchers from other institutions of higher learning are not eligible to apply as principal investigators. However, researchers from other HEIs can be included as co-investigators or resource persons. Students may not apply as PIs but may also, be part of a research team whose PI is an academic staff. Collaboration with research personnel with a minimum of a master’s degree from civil society organizations, independent research institutions, business and industry is encouraged. To be eligible for funding, a research team should meet the following criteria:

  1.  The Principal Investigator (PI) should be an academic or research staff of Makerere University on permanent or fulltime contract or a senior staff member from one of the administrative units linked to research (Library, Gender Mainstreaming, Quality Assurance, Guidance and Counselling, Planning and the Directorate of Research and Graduate Training (DRGT))
  2. The PI must not be a holder of a current award under RIF-Round 1 as PI; however, RIF 1 PIs are allowed to be on teams
  3.  The PI should be actively in service (not on study or sabbatical leave)
  4.  The PI should obtain a letter of support from his/her department or school or College (any one of the three)
  5.  The PI should attach a copy of his/her appointment letter or most-recent letter of promotion issued by the Directorate of Human Resource of Makerere University
  6. A researcher cannot be a PI on more than TWO applications. It is allowable for any person (PI or not) to be on up to a maximum of three applications.
  7.  Researchers from Makerere University are encouraged to collaborate with resource persons from civil society organizations, government sectors, other universities within and outside Uganda, independent research institutions, business and industry as part of their teams; in such cases, the external team members will provide a letter of support from their institution.

Research fellows working in projects within academic units but are not appointed centrally by Makerere University are not eligible as PIs but may be part of a research team. Students, in general, are not eligible to apply as PIs. However, students with strong ideas can market them to their academic supervisors/mentors who can apply on their behalf

C1. The research problem

The RIF is meant to fill research gaps arising from development priorities of government and it’s implementing partners. Only research/innovation problems that have a clear link to the national development priorities and align with the thematic priorities of the comprehensive multi-stakeholder research agenda will be funded. The proposed solution (research or innovation) must be articulated clearly including the knowledge or intervention gap it is trying to address. Research problems will also be assessed on the basis of their responsiveness to the needs of government, industry, and academia. Researchers should ask themselves the question: “If you were a decision-maker in the government sector, would this research be very useful to you?” Three broad types of research gaps are anticipated: 1) Those that need primary research to fill a critical knowledge gap, 2) Those that need an innovation (technology or approach) to address a critical pain point or community need, and 3) Those that target research or innovation (R&I) ecosystem enhancement to overcome a major barrier that prevents high-value research from being conducted.  For projects that require research, the research problem (i.e. the discrepancy between the current knowledge and the desired knowledge) should be clearly articulated. For projects that are innovation-based, a clear articulation of the stakeholder need/pain-point that needs the solution should be articulated. For projects that require ecosystem enhancement, the discrepancy between the existing capacity for research services and the desired capacity should be clearly articulated. All three types of problems should be aligned with one or more themes in the research agenda.

C2. The proposed solution

Researchers should clearly articulate the objectives of the planned research and the proposed solutions. Researchers should also describe the critical content of the solution (i.e. the ‘research methodology’ for projects that are primarily research, or the ‘technical approach’ for projects that are innovation based, or the content of the planned enhancement for projects targeting R&I ecosystem enhancement).  Researchers should defend the relevance of the proposed solution to addressing key development outcomes of the respective sector and its alignment to one or more thematic areas specified in this call. Researchers/innovators should also demonstrate that the research is feasible and will result in tangible results within one (1) year of execution. Research projects that require multi-year implementation will only be considered if they can show actionable intermediate results attainable within 1 implementation year. Apart from a summary of the proposed approach, researchers will provide a more detailed description of their technical approach to enable a robust assessment of the rigor of the proposed methodology. For research-based projects, researchers should describe clearly but concisely the methods proposed, demonstrating scientific merit and rigor. For innovation-based projects, researchers should describe concisely the design approach to be used and the stage of the solution proposed. For R&I ecosystem enhancement-based projects, a description of the content of the enhancement (e.g. specialized training activities or specialized equipment to be procured, its installation, specialized training in its use) should be provided. (Note: Training in basic research skills or procuring simple routine equipment shall not be considered unless it is part of a holistic system upgrade).

C3. Outputs, outcomes and impact

Researchers will be expected to describe clearly the outputs anticipated to arise from their research projects. Outputs are the immediate tangible results of the research or innovation activities undertaken. Beyond outputs, applicants will describe the anticipated outcomes and impacts of the solution they propose. The target populations (primary and secondary) to be involved in and impacted by the research should be clearly described as well as the anticipated reach of the outcomes and impacts stated. Since this funding is specific to the current financial year, projects must demonstrate clearly the deliverables they expect within one year, matching the level of investment made and attainable in the 1-year timeframe.

Often times, science requires more than one year of implementation to effectively answer the required study questions. However, since the available funding has been committed for one Financial Year, all proposed projects including multi-year projects must articulate clearly the deliverables expected to be attained within one (1) year. Within particular funding round, research proposals will not receive grants that span more than one year. However, cognizant of the fact that some projects require longer timelines, Round 2 and Round 3 funding will be provided for in the subsequent years' Projects wishing to attract Round 2 and 3 funding will compete for this funding with new applications for extension funding

C4. Team composition

Researchers may apply individually or in teams. Team applications will be at an added advantage but are not absolute. Individuals or teams should demonstrate that they have the technical expertise to execute the planned study. Disciplines relevant to the proposed research question/innovation challenge should be represented. For research areas where a multi-sectoral/multi-disciplinary approach is clearly needed, the extent to which the composition of the team covers the pertinent sectors/disciplines will be important. Teams that include industry, business, sector or implementing agency partner will have an added advantage.

C5. Provision for capacity development

Research and innovations that include a capacity-building component will be at an advantage. Researchers should articulate how they expect their research project to build capacity for stakeholders and their own departments. Examples could include mentorship of junior researchers, equipment, and training of investigators, students, research fellows or research assistants. Co-designing of the research methodology or participation in field implementation, data management or analysis are other possible avenues for capacity building. Projects may include provisions for students to benefit from the research process and may even involve teams of students from different academic disciplines working together.

C6. Dissemination Plan/Scalability/Sustainability

Since this fund is aimed at supporting government and its partners to improve service delivery and to accelerate development, researchers/Innovators should show a clear plan for dissemination their findings to audiences critical for policy and program change so as to achieve impact at scale. For primarily research-based projects, this will include a clear description of the knowledge translation and dissemination plan to stakeholders in the relevant sectors including the knowledge products anticipated to arise from the study (e.g. policy briefs, knowledge briefs, publications, etc.). Research without a clear link to dissemination or policy/program impact will not be funded. Innovation-based projects should articulate a scaling strategy, including linkage to scaling partners within the industry (for commercially viable enterprises), or within the relevant public sectors (for innovations targeted to the public) or within relevant implementing agencies (for social enterprises). Innovations targeting commercial interest should demonstrate the anticipated commercial potential, anticipated demand, anticipated patents/copy-rights/industrial design claims/trademarks if applicable and the path to commercialization. Innovations targeting social impact (social innovations) should elucidate the path to wide-scale community uptake. Teams that already have the necessary connections to sector ministries, implementing partner agencies (e.g. NGOs) or industry partners should articulate these connections.

For research and innovation initiatives that are expected to run longer than 3 years, researchers should articulate the sustainability of their projects beyond the RIF funding. Sustainability may also mean the availability of co-funding or continued funding beyond RIF. However, for projects that have already received or anticipated funding from elsewhere, researchers should show how the RIF funding fits into the broader funding structure.

C7. Ethical implications and Environmental Impact

For research or innovation projects involving human subjects and are not benign investigations, researchers should clearly articulate the anticipated ethical challenges if any, how subjects will be protected and how they will obtain the relevant ethical certifications. If your research involves animal subjects, in what ways are animal subjects involved and how will the animals be protected? How will animal welfare be ensured? For research that involves changes to the physical environment, researchers should explain the measures to ensure minimal damage to the environment and to monitor and act on such damage.

C8. Conflict of interest declaration

Researchers will declare if there is any conflict of interest regarding their project e.g. if it is co-funded by an industry partner that may compromise the impartiality of the team or the outcomes of the study. Teams with strong linkages to GMC members should declare this so that it is duly addressed during the selection process.

C9. Budget

Researchers will prepare a summary budget for their project. Budgets should be submitted in the official currency (Uganda Shillings).  Because these are university funds, academic units (Departments, Schools, and Colleges) will not charge institutional overheads to any of the research funds. Budgets should not spread beyond one Financial Year. Projects requiring multi-year implementation should indicate so in the application. However, such projects should only provide a budget for one Financial Year. Multi-year budgets will only be funded to the extent needed for this financial year and within the grant caps indicated in the grant categories. Failure to articulate a one (1) year budget might lead to disqualification. The budgets will include the following sections:

  • 0 Personnel costs
  • 0 Travel
  • 0 Supplies and services
  • 0 Equipment
  • 0 Program activity costs
  • 0 Dissemination

Under Personnel costs, applicants should not budget for ‘Salaries’ for staff who are paid a salary by Makerere University or another Government of Uganda institution (whether on permanent or contract terms) as this would constitute double payment from government funds. However, salaries can be included for critical project staff that is not paid by Makerere or the Government of Uganda e.g. Project Coordinators. Researchers can budget for ‘activity-based’ or ‘level-of-effort-based’ costs for their additional time input and that of other resource persons. Personnel costs excluding field research assistants should not exceed 33% of the budget. Field research assistants if needed should be included under ‘Program Activity Costs’. All salaries and all repetitive allowances will be subject to mandatory statutory deductions at source, to pay the relevant taxes.

 

In addition to the summary budget, research teams will be required to attach a detailed budget (As an MS Excel attachment) that breaks down all expenditure line items, inclusive of a budget justification that explains the rationale behind the different budget items. Teams that do not attach a detailed budget and budget justification might not be evaluated. The level of efficiency in the budget will be a major evaluation criterion.

C10. Workplan

Researchers will provide a list of key milestones for the project clearly demonstrating the deliverables expected at each point. These will be used as the basis for tracking the implementation of activities towards project goals and outputs. Given the time implications of the awards, it will be important that researchers commit to a clear time-bound set of deliverables all achievable within one year for the main deliverable targeted during the current period of funding. Failure to articulate a one (1) year plan will imply the inability to utilize the grant funds within one (1) year.

D1. Submission of applications

For the present round, applications will open on Friday 20th March 2020. Submission of applications will be done via an online platform: http://rif.mak.ac.ug/portal. Applicants must first register in the grants website in order to access the application. The Grants Committee will not consider applications submitted by any other means. Applicants are therefore advised to prepare their submissions on-time. If an applicant experiences any challenges in the submission process, they should send an email to: info@rif.mak.ac.ug . The closing date for submissions is Friday 24th May 2020.

D2. Application form

The application form is available on-line at the following link: http://rif.mak.ac.ug/portal. Because it is a one-step application, applicants should read and understand all the key requirements of the different sections of the form so as to provide all the critical information required within the word limit provided. All entries will be conducted on-line. However, applicants can down-load a PDF/MS Word version of the form to enable preparations before filling in the domains. Applicants can also copy and paste information into the online application domains.

D3. Rules governing applications

All applications should be written in English. All applications should be submitted via the online portal mentioned above. Complete applications must be submitted not later than 11.59 pm East African Time on the closing date. No submissions after the closure of applications will be accepted. Any attempt at the solicitation of acceptance beyond this date will not be entertained. The Grants Committee bears no responsibility for submissions that are not completed in time and incomplete submissions will not be considered. If no application meets the required threshold to receive a grant, the call maybe reopened at the sole discretion of the Grants Management Committee. An individual researcher should not submit more than TWO applications as a principal investigator. However, it is allowable for a PI on a submitted project to be a co-investigator on up to two other submitted projects.

Participants agree to assume any and all risks, and waive claims against Makerere University and the Grants Management Committee for any injury, death, damage, or loss of property, revenue, or profits, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, arising from their participation in this grant implementation.

D4. Applicant support

Sensitization: The GMC will hold an online meeting (due to the COVID-19 pandemic) at Facebook Live using the Makerere University official Facebook account (https://facebook.com/Makerere) on Friday 27/03/2020 at 11:00am to present key aspects of the grant. Subsequent sessions will be held with the Colleges on dates to be provided.

Q&A: Applicants will have an opportunity to ask questions and obtain answers/clarifications regarding this RFP or any part of the application process. The question submission period will run from Monday 30/03/2020 to Monday 13/04/2020. Questions should be submitted to info@rif.mak.ac.ug. The Questions and Answers will be posted on the FAQ section on the platform website http://rif.mak.ac.ug  by Friday 17/04/2020.

Webinar: The Grants Management Committee will host a public webinar on Friday 17/04/2020 as a support opportunity for potential applicants needing additional support. College-level sensitization activities may also be conducted.

D5. Review of applications

A three (3) step application evaluation process will be used. Step 1 will involve determination of eligibility. This will be conducted by the GMC Secretariat to select only those applications that fit within the eligibility criteria specified in sub-section B1 of this document. Step 2 will involve a detailed technical review, undertaken by an independent team of credible reviewers (Ugandan and international) appointed by the GMC and aligned to the technical expertise required of the different applications. The review process will take a cross-disciplinary approach in which in addition to subject matter experts, reviewers from other disciplines that align with the core-discipline of the research idea will be engaged. Reviewers will conduct an electronic scoring of the applications based on standardized criteria. Each proposal will be reviewed by atleast 2 reviewers. A shortlist of the best proposals will be provided to the GMC. In Step 3 of the review, the GMC which will select from the best scoring proposals the ones to be funded. This will be strongly guided by the scores and recommendations from Step 2. However, the GMC will consider additional aspects like clear link to the funder’s vision and the research agenda themes as well as impact within the relevant sector, equity between Colleges, consideration of gender and junior faculty, the budgets and the funds available.

D6. Evaluation criteria

The following evaluation criteria will be used:

Category Criterion Score
1. The problem Is the problem clearly articulated i.e. the knowledge gap (for research-based projects) or the stakeholder need (for innovation based projects) or the research capacity gap (for research ecosystem development projects)? __/5
Does the problem clearly align to a theme within the priority research areas identified in the research agenda? __/15
2. The proposed solution Is the proposed solution aligned to the problem? Is the proposed solution aligned to the research/innovation needs specified in the Research Agenda _/5
Is the idea innovative? Does it have the potential to add substantially to knowledge (for research based projects) or to improve the way things are done (for innovation-based projects) or to enhance research capacity (for ecosystem enhancement projects) __/10
3. Technical approach and methodology Are the objectives (either research objectives, or innovation objectives, or ecosystem capacity development objectives) clear and attainable? __/5
Is the methodology clearly articulated? Does the methodology have a sound scientific basis? Is the methodology appropriate to the research questions? __/20
4. Anticipated results/Impact Is there a clear articulation of results expected from the project (Outputs as well as anticipated outcomes? Note: Impact is optional given the time duration of the projects). __/5
4. Anticipated results/Impact Are there clear deliverables to show within 1 year and are the deliverables worth the investment? __/5
5. Team composition Does the research team have adequate technical capacity/expertise to execute the project including multi-sectorality where needed? __/3
5. Team composition Empowerment: Are women researchers included on the team? Are young faculty included on the team? __/2
6. Capacity building Is there provision for capacity building through mentorship of students or young faculty? __/3
6. Capacity building Does the proposal describe ways in which the capacity of the unit (Department, School or Unit) will be strengthened? __/2
7. Dissemination plan and scalability Is there a clear articulation of a dissemination plan (for research based projects) or a scaling plan (for innovation-based projects) or a commercialization plan (for projects with a commercial orientation)? __/5
7. Dissemination plan and scalability Does the dissemination/scaling plan show anticipated impacts to policy or programs or to society beyond the study? __/5
8. Feasibility Is the project is viable, implementable, with the potential to have significant milestones within 1 year? Is it ethically and environmentally sound? __/5
8. Feasibility Is the budget realistic and feasible? Are the budget items rational (i.e. not over-budgeted or under-budgeted? __/5
Total score __/100

D7. Notification of successful applicants

Successful applicants will be informed by email to their designated point of contact. Successful teams will also be profiled on the grants website: http://rif.mak.ac.ug. Researchers should be cognizant of the fact that not all research applicants should expect to be funded - this is a normal part of grants processes. The GMC will be as impartial and as technical as possible in the selection process to ensure that the best projects win. Not winning a grant should therefore not be construed as being a result of an unfair selection process. GMC members have sworn an oath of impartiality and readiness to serve with diligence.

D8. Tracking your application

The grant website will contain information on the status of the applications at the different stages. Tracking will be provided for the entire batch of applications and not for individual applications.

D9. Post award processes

Due to the urgent need to produce results and ensure accountability, the GMC and its Secretariat will conduct a series of post-award activities to awardees. While these will target as little interference as possible, they will be focused on ensuring that set milestones are achieved, the evidence of anticipated deliverables is available and that funds are accounted for in time. In particular, support processes will include:

  • Induction: A brief post-award induction
  • Contracting: The GMC will execute an agreement with the awardees on the terms and conditions of the award.
  • Capacity building: The GMC Secretariat will provide inductive orientation for researchers (open to both awardees and non-awardees) on 1) Research project management; 2) Financial Management; 3) Research Leadership; 4) Gender and inclusiveness in research and 5) Research translation for impact. Schedules of this training will be made available in due course. These courses will also be made continually available for long term capacity building.
  • Release of funds: Release of funds will be in phases incumbent on proper accountability and demonstration of milestones achieved in the previous payment phase.
  • Tracking of deliverables, performance, and accountability: The Grant Secretariat will conduct continuous checks on awardees to ensure deliverables are met, funds are utilized, and releases are accounted for. Consistent failure to demonstrate deliverables or utilize funds might lead to the issuance of unspent balances to other grantees. Therefore for the avoidance of large amounts of unspent balances, the GMC will maintain dynamic tracking of the performance of projects and might decide to reallocate non-performing awards to those that need them.
  • Reporting: Awardee researchers will provide interim reports every three (3) months using a standard reporting form that will be provided by the GMC.
D10. Intellectual property

Intellectual Property derived through the Government grants will be owned jointly by the awardee Teams and Makerere University. All awardee teams grant to Makerere University and the Government of Uganda are non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to use any resultant or derived intellectual property (e.g. product, service, or technology) that will be developed using the Government grants for development work of public benefit without encumbrance. However for projects that have a commercial value, researchers will clearly delineate any intellectual property included that is their creation. The GMC will undertake a determination of what percentage of stake the university will claim on the basis of its investment into the idea. Notwithstanding this, the researchers retain the bulk of the claim to intellectual property arising from their project. All proceeds accruing from commercialization of IP generated via government grants, following the conclusion of the grant period will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis amongst the parties, but with the researchers taking a controlling stake.

D11. Grant timeline

Milestone Dates
1. Issuance of RFA Friday 20/03/2020
2. Researcher sensitization Online meeting Friday 27/03/2020
3. Q&A period Monday 30/03/2020 to Monday 13/04/2020
4. Posting of FAQs Friday 17/04/2020
5. Researcher Webinar Friday 17/04/2020
6. Closing date for applications Sunday 24/05/2020
7. Selection – stage 1 TBA
8. Selection – stage 2 TBA
9. Selection – stage 3 TBA
10. Award notification TBA
11. Induction TBA

D12. Subsequent RFAs within this Financial Year’s funding

At the discretion of the Grants Management Committee, subsequent calls within this round or new rounds of calls may be issued within this Financial Year, depending on availability of resources, the performance of awardees, and other provisions within the Framework document and Terms of Reference for management of the Government RIF.


To Register and fill in your application form, please click here

Related Posts

1 Comment

  • Our Project “Embracing Soft Skills as the Building Blocks for the Realization of Decent Employment among Youth in Uganda” was indicated as a two- year project. Do I have to re-apply for RIF2

Comments are closed.